Paid Full-System Audit
Condition Score
We analyze what your AI is already producing, where your system breaks, and how those failures translate into rework, delays, compliance exposure, and lost revenue.
No system access required. No engineering lift. Just outputs and standards.
Timeline
5 business days
Investment
$7,500
Deliverable
24-page report
What It Measures
Four dimensions of system trust.
Condition Score evaluates the underlying system that governs how your content is created, approved, and deployed, not just what it looks like on the surface. Each dimension is scored based on real evidence from your outputs and standards.
01
Accuracy
How reliably your system produces correct, consistent, and defensible output across surfaces. Failures here create misinformation, support burden, and credibility loss.
02
Ownership
How clearly accountability is defined across your content system. Undefined ownership leads to delays, missed approvals, and unmanaged risk.
03
Consistency
How stable your language, terminology, and patterns are across channels and teams. Inconsistency fragments user experience and degrades conversion.
04
Traceability
How easily outputs can be traced back to standards, sources, and decisions. Lack of traceability creates compliance exposure and slows every escalation.
What You Receive
A 24-page assessment artifact.
Every Condition Score engagement produces a structured, multi-page report designed for internal circulation and decision-making.
01 / 06
Score Card
A one-page executive summary with overall score, classification, and dimension breakdown.
02 / 06
Trust Dimension Map
A clear view of how your system performs across Accuracy, Ownership, Consistency, and Traceability.
03 / 06
Failure Inventory
A ranked list of real system failures identified from your outputs. Not categories. Specific breakdowns of what is going wrong and where.
04 / 06
Ownership Gap Report
A map of who owns what across your system, and where no accountable owner exists.
05 / 06
Risk Map
Failures ranked by severity and tied to real consequences: adoption risk, compliance exposure, rework cost, and deployment fragility.
06 / 06
30-Day Prescription
A sequenced, actionable plan focused on what to fix first and why.
Material Trust Gaps
Pillar Breakdown
/ 100
Top Risk
Approval workflows exist but aren't consistently followed.
Estimated rework: 12 hrs / week
Sample Assessment Preview
Score Interpretation
How to read the score.
The score is not the output. It is the entry point into the system analysis.
Conditioned
System is operationally sound. Governance is in place. AI can scale without introducing material risk.
Undertrained
Core structures exist, but gaps will surface under AI pressure. Moderate revenue and efficiency risk.
Out of Shape
Significant system failures. AI adoption will amplify inconsistency, rework, and compliance exposure.
Deployment Risk
Critical gaps in governance and structure. AI will compound operational failure and revenue loss.
Common questions:
How does this connect to revenue?
Each failure identified in the report maps to a real operational cost: rework hours, delayed launches, compliance escalations, and lost conversion. The report makes those costs visible and actionable.
What happens after the assessment?
You receive a 24-page report with your score, system analysis, and a prioritized 30-day prescription. Most teams use this to align stakeholders before investing in deeper system work.
Is this just an audit?
It's an audit, but not the kind most teams are used to. Condition Score does not just inventory assets or review content at the surface level. It audits the operating system underneath: standards, ownership, consistency, and traceability.
Do we need internal access or technical setup?
No. We work from what your system is already producing. Outputs and standards are enough to surface meaningful system failures.
Quantify where your system breaks under pressure.
5 business days · $7,500 · 24-page audit report